The designed construction of closing the intake channel, variant A-1 is characterized by the following parameters:
| Number of fields (closures) | 7 |
|---|---|
| Height of the gate | 8.13 m, 5.53 m, 4.53 m, 4.13 m, 3.13m |
| Width of the middle weir fields | 100.00 m |
| Width of the edge weir fields | 75.00 m |
| Gate construction | 3 x sheet gate, 100.00 x 8.13 m + 1 x sheet gate, 100.00 x 5.53 m + 1 x sheet gate 75.00 x 4.53 m + 1 x sheet gate 100.00 x 4.13 m + 1 x sheet gate 75.00 x 3.13 m |
| Elevation of the intake bottom | 123.47 m a.s.l. |
| Elevation of maximum allowed water level | 131.50 m a.s.l. |
| Elevation of max. operational water level | 131.10 m a.s.l. |
| Elevation of water level at Q100 | 131.10 m a.s.l. |
Scenario A-2 solves communicational interconnection of the intake channel by means of a tunnel construction with five 100-meter wide middle fields and two 75-metre wide edge fields. Width of the pillars is 5 metres and length of the pillars is 24.40 m.
| Number of fields (closures) | 7 |
|---|---|
| Height of the gate | 8.13 m, 6.23 m, 4.83 m |
| Width of the middle weir fields | 100.00 m |
| Width of the edge weir fields | 75.00 m |
| Gate construction | 3 x sheet gate, 100.00 x 8.13 m + 2 x sheet gate 100.00 x 6.23 m + 2 x sheet gate 75.00 x 4.83 m |
| Elevation of the intake bottom | 123.47 m a.s.l. |
| Elevation of maximum allowed water level | 131.50 m a.s.l. |
| Elevation of max. operational water level | 131.10 m a.s.l. |
| Elevation of water level at Q100 | 131.10 m a.s.l. |
Basic characteristics of the construction and its future operation:
The project solves closing of the intake channel and communicational interconnection of the left-side and the right-side part of the channel for passenger motor transport, cyclists and pedestrians. The feasibility study was conducted in two locations. Location A is situated between the stage Čunovo and Hamuliakovo. Location B is situated between municipalities Dobrohošť and Kyselica. There were 4 alternatives designed for every location. Alternatives A-1 and A-2 were outlined in a further detail.
Alternative A-1 solves communicational interconnection of the intake channel with a bridge construction with five 100-m and two 75-metre wide edge fields. Light height of the middle field considered for shipping is 9.10 m. Width of the pillars is 5.00 m and length of the pillars is 24.17 m.